|
Comparison of phlebovirus Gc with Alphavirus E1 using the PRSS3 sequence algorithm. |
||||||||
| Alphavirus E11 |
||||||||
| Phlebovirus Gc |
SIN |
SFV |
WEE |
VEE |
MAY |
RRV |
BFV |
ONN |
|
|
||||||||
| SAN |
0.002 |
0.02 |
0.001 |
0.004 |
0.05 |
NS |
0.03 |
0.007 |
| RVF |
0.04 |
NS |
0.03 |
0.003 |
NS |
NS |
0.04 |
NS |
| PTV |
NS |
0.04 |
0.0002 |
0.0004 |
NS |
NS |
NS2 |
NS |
| UUK |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS3 |
NS |
0.05 |
NS |
NS |
|
1Two-way comparisons were done between the full-length amino acid sequences of the indicated glycoproteins. Probabilities (p values) of a significant alignment are based on 1000 shuffles. SAN: Sandfly fever virus, RVF: Rift valley fever virus; PTV: Punta Toro virus; UUK: Uukuniemi virus; SIN: Sindbis virus; SFV: Semliki Forest virus; WEE: Western equine encephalitis virus; VEE: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus; MAY: Mayaro virus; RRV: Ross River virus; BFV: Barmah Forest virus; ONN: O'nyong-nyong virus. 2p = 0.08 3p = 0.07 | ||||||||
Garry and Garry Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 2004 1:10 doi:10.1186/1742-4682-1-10 |
||||||||